michelangelo pistoletto

September 29, 2009 § Leave a comment

venus of the rags (michelangelo pistolleto, 1967, 74) photographed by zeno de cock

venus of the rags 1967, 74 (michelangelo pistoletto) photographed by zeno de cock

 

 “To be a true ecologist [artist] today, one must re-establish the aesthetics of beauty within the realm of human trash and material waste.” –Slavoj Žižek (…maybe Žižek wouldn’t mind the minor alteration.)

Michelangelo Pistoletto pushed together a pile of rags & a statue of Venus in 1967 & 74.  The above photograph is by the Belgian photographer Zeno de Cock from an exhibit in his hometown of Antwerp.  Zeno’s photo captures the immediacy of the profound assemblage.  

Venus of the Rags is redolent of the radical sixties & it is also an icon of Italian Arte Povera.  Arte Povera was young & getting started when Pistoletto created the Venus.  The sculpture speaks to a few key ideas of the style.  Arte Povera is seen as anti-modernist, in that it (ostensibly) rejected the idealistic (high-modern) minimalism of the time.  Conversely, it shared the reductive (minimalist) language that attempted to distill art to its essentials, its elemental basics & the bare minimum (albeit without the assumed sterility of some American minimalism).  Arte Povera (loosely: poor art) was not necessarily an aesthetic of impoverishment, rather it was getting back to essentials—reaching to nature, the mundane, the everyday, even to classical antiquity (thus anticipating post-modernism) & also back to classic art materials (wood, marble & gold among others).

Pistoletto posed a dialectic with the discarded rags & a concrete cast replica of (Bertel Thorvaldsen’s) Venus (with the apple).  Thorvaldsen’s Venus is holding an (unseen) apple & is from the legend “the Judgment of Paris.” The legend is not addressed by Pistoletto, however the goddess of love & beauty (Venus) was awarded the golden apple by Paris (remember too, Paris gave into her irresistible bribe of a beautiful woman).  The significance resides in the symbol of Venus as beauty (ideal beauty).  The rags are from Pistoletto’s studio & were used to clean his signature stainless-steel mirrors.  We know that Pistoletto made several versions of the sculpture, including a live performance & he also made a gold (gilt) version. 

This is an artwork of contrasts & reflection.  We have high art coupled with an upsurge of refuse.  Beauty’s facing rejected trash.  Simple nudity is amidst an overload of used-garments.  Refinement married to disgust.  If we take the sculpture as a metaphor, it is an easy stand-in for our own confrontation with our now omnipresent waste.  Venus of the Rags is a emblem to throw-away culture.  It is as if she’s urging us to consider the aesthetic of decay & how that can inform a new & timely (re)consideration.  Why should we care about our waste?  What is important about the dialectic: beauty vs. trash?

We’ll also recall Pistoletto’s mirrors.  While Venus isn’t looking into a mirror, she is looking at a polarity with which she’s part of. Other sculptures show where Pistoletto has taken classical statuary & positioned it with a real mirror suggesting that the statue were made for this purpose—made for reflection & contemplation. 

Venus of the Rags is dialogue of the present with the ancient, resulting in a new perspective (dare I say a globalizing view) that includes the banal & everyday with the beautiful.  Germano Celant (who coined the term Arte Povera) writes on Pistoletto’s Venus (specifically addressing the rags).  The rags represent: “…the confusion & multivalence of marginalized people, the totalities of random & disparate communities of social rejects…that is the rags of society.”     

Now we’re at another confrontation: the world’s wealthy contrasted with the poor.  Again the artwork assumes a broader relevance.  How do we regard the poor?—or the rich for that matter?  We know these enormous questions need our attention & we know that art can help us see clearly (not only in a strict visual sense), more fundamentally, & then perhaps ethically.  Art positions our problems to be observed, before we can understand them.

It is a great teacher/master who can create a didactic sculpture that is fresh & engaging (40-something years later).  Pistoletto’s “poor art” perennially inspires growth & interaction.  We know that Michelangelo Pistoletto continues to make art & he’s opened a foundation: Cittadellarte-Fondazione Pistoletto, where he proposes “a new role for the artist: that of placing art in direct interaction with all the areas of human activity which form society.” 

 

Aurelio Madrid

Advertisements

Tagged: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading michelangelo pistoletto at luctor et emergo.

meta

%d bloggers like this: